Luca Staeheli vs Tymur Bieldiugin Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Staeheli's second serve win rate over the last six months is 45.61%, slightly better than Bieldiugin's 44.7%, suggesting a marginal edge in this area.
• In return games, Bieldiugin excels, securing 45.77% of opponents' second serve points, compared to Staeheli's 41.61%, indicating a strong return game.
• When facing a first serve, Bieldiugin also leads with a 31.78% win rate, as opposed to Staeheli's 29.32%, which may be impactful in crucial points.
• Under pressure, Staeheli has saved 54.29% of breakpoints, outperforming Bieldiugin's 47.98%, reflecting better resilience in critical moments.
• Over the last year, both have similar overall performance: Staeheli has a win rate of 62.5%, barely edging Bieldiugin's 61.7%, a nearly indistinct comparison.
• Regarding surface preferences, Staeheli shines on Indoor Hard with a 58% win rate, while Bieldiugin matches this figure on Clay, reflecting differing surface strengths.
• Both players predominantly compete in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments with comparable success rates, which might diffuse major level-based discrepancies.
• Evaluating opponent quality, Staeheli's competitions have averaged a ranking of 273.88, while Bieldiugin's average is 251.02, suggesting marginally tougher matches for Bieldiugin.
• If the match extends to a deciding set, Staeheli has a 63% success rate, slightly ahead of Bieldiugin's 60%, potentially crucial in close ties.
• In converting breakpoints, Staeheli is more efficient at 39.58% in recent matches, compared to Bieldiugin’s 36.84%, which could impact pivotal moments.
• Have the players competed at this event yet? Performances in current events can provide vital insight, so this factor should not be ignored.

Editorial Prediction (August 28, 2025, UTC):

Given the nuances presented in recent statistics, both players display near parity in overall match performance and preferences for different court surfaces.

Staeheli exhibits slightly greater proficiency in second serve effectiveness and the ability to convert breakpoints during critical phases of the match. Staeheli also shows superior resilience under breakpoint pressure and closing out deciding sets, which could be influential.

Meanwhile, Bieldiugin shows strength in return games, offering a competitive edge with superior statistics in both second and first serve returns. The quality of opponents Bieldiugin has faced also suggests substantial experience in high-pressure scenarios.

Despite these close comparisons, Staeheli's combination of breakpoint resistance and marginally higher efficiency in converting opportunities presents a slight advantage, indicating Staeheli is the likely favorite to win this match.